A leaked Hillary Clinton email has now confirmed that the
Obama administration, with Hillary directing policy, orch
estrated a civil war in Syria to benefit Israel's geopolitical in
terests and stability. The new Wikileaks release shows that C
linton, then Secretary of State orchestrated the war in Syria t
o overthrow the government of President Assad, because it is
“best way to help Israel”
Newobserveronline.com reports: The document was one of
many unclassified by the US Department of State under case
number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the
uproar over Clinton's private email server kept at her house
while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.
Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as
December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the
contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012
talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in
Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December
31, 2012. The email makes it clear that it has been US policy
from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian
government—and specifically to do this because it is in
Israel's interests. “The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's
growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria
overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly
starts off by saying. Even though all US intelligence reports
had long dismissed Iran's “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a
conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy
Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify”
destroying Syria in the name of Israel. She specifically links
Iran's mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she
says, Iran's “atom bomb” program threatens Israel's
“monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East. If Iran
were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would
allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi
Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would
threaten Israel's interests. Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has
to be destroyed. Iran's nuclear program and Syria's civil war
may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military
leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing
their nuclear monopoly. An Iranian nuclear weapons
capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but
could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and
Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious
nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to
provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and
Lebanon, as it can today. If Iran were to reach the threshold
of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier
to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel,
knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent
to Israel responding against Iran itself. It is, Clinton
continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the
regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for
Iran to undermine Israel's security. This would not come
about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in
the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has
never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.” The end of
the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel's
leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its
interests. Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive
boon to Israel's security, it would also ease Israel's
understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then,
Israel and the United States might be able to develop a
common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous
that military action could be warranted. Clinton goes on to
asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family”
with violence is the “right thing” to do: In short, the White
House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel
over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria. With his life and
his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change
the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad's mind. The email proves—
as if any more proof was needed—that the US government
has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the
Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel. It is also a
sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which
currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked
off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are
any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria. In
addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian
conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and
the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking
the fires of war in Syria. The real and disturbing possibility
that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted
death and misery upon millions of people—could become the
next president of America is the most deeply shocking
thought of all. Clinton's public assertion that, if elected
president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the
next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the
enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of
all peace-loving people on earth....
via Choice And Truth
0 comments:
Post a Comment