Monday, November 7, 2016

A leaked Hillary Clinton email has now confirmed that the 

Obama administration, with Hillary directing policy, orch

estrated a civil war in Syria to benefit Israel's geopolitical in

terests and stability. The new Wikileaks release shows that C

linton, then Secretary of State orchestrated the war in Syria t

o overthrow the government of President Assad, because it is 

“best way to help Israel” reports: The document was one of 

many unclassified by the US Department of State under case 

number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the 

uproar over Clinton's private email server kept at her house 

while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013. 

Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as 

December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the 

contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 

talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in 

Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 

31, 2012. The email makes it clear that it has been US policy 

from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian 

government—and specifically to do this because it is in 

Israel's interests. “The best way to help Israel deal with Iran's 

growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria 

overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly 

starts off by saying. Even though all US intelligence reports 

had long dismissed Iran's “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a 

conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy 

Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify” 

destroying Syria in the name of Israel. She specifically links 

Iran's mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she 

says, Iran's “atom bomb” program threatens Israel's 

“monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East. If Iran 

were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would 

allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi 

Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would 

threaten Israel's interests. Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has 

to be destroyed. Iran's nuclear program and Syria's civil war 

may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military 

leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing 

their nuclear monopoly. An Iranian nuclear weapons 

capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but 

could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and 

Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious 

nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to 

provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and 

Lebanon, as it can today. If Iran were to reach the threshold 

of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier 

to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, 

knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent 

to Israel responding against Iran itself. It is, Clinton 

continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the 

regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for 

Iran to undermine Israel's security. This would not come 

about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in 

the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has 

never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.” The end of 

the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel's 

leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its 

interests. Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive 

boon to Israel's security, it would also ease Israel's 

understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly. Then, 

Israel and the United States might be able to develop a 

common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous 

that military action could be warranted. Clinton goes on to 

asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family” 

with violence is the “right thing” to do: In short, the White 

House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel 

over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria. With his life and 

his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change 

the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad's mind. The email proves—

as if any more proof was needed—that the US government 

has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the 

Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel. It is also a 

sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which 

currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked 

off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are 

any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria. In 

addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian 

conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and 

the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking 

the fires of war in Syria. The real and disturbing possibility 

that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted 

death and misery upon millions of people—could become the 

next president of America is the most deeply shocking 

thought of all. Clinton's public assertion that, if elected 

president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the 

next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the 

enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of 

all peace-loving people on earth....

via Choice And Truth


Post a Comment